> I just had a thought regarding the Decimal class. If the longer-term > intention is to move the class into the core, then would it be > sensible to name the class "decimal" (lowercase) rather than > "Decimal"? The situation seems similar to the set class, which > undergoes a capitalisation change in 2.4 in a similar manner. I think it's actually a good thing to have a name change; there are always going to be incompatibilities, and code must be able to use the old and the new way together. If they are named the same that just confuses matters. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4