Guido van Rossum wrote: >... > > Maybe you'll change your mind when open() can return other objects > besides files. In the mean time, let's use the compatibility > argument. Changing things just because a new century has started > sounds like a fad to me -- IOW the argument "it's the modern thing to > do" usually doesn't convince me. I don't understand why they are both builtins. Why provide two bindings for the same thing? I always presumed (as others did) that there was a new way and an old way maintained for backwards compatibility. Paul Prescod
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4