RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jul 7 06:04:40 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/045931.html

> Then should the following line in the reference be changed?
> 
> "The file() constructor is new in Python 2.2. The previous spelling,
> open(), is retained for compatibility, and is an alias for file()."
> 
> That *strongly* suggests that the preferred spelling is file(), and
> that open() shouldn't be used for new code.

Oops, yes.  I didn't write that, and it doesn't convey my feelings
about file() vs. open().  Here's a suggestion for better words:

"The file class is new in Python 2.2.  It represents the type (class)
of objects returned by the built-in open() function.  Its constructor
is an alias for open(), but for future and backwards compatibility,
open() remains preferred."

--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/045931.html below:

[Python-Dev] file() or open()?