RetroSearch Browse

Wed Jul 7 02:43:05 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/045924.html

I have always used open() myself. does this mean we should continue to 
use open()?  I only use it because that is what I first started using  
and don't know any better.

Guido van Rossum wrote:

>I recently saw a checkin that changed a call to open() into a call to
>file(), suggesting that using file() is more "politically correct"
>than open().
>
>I'm not sure I agree with this.  While open() and file() are currently
>aliases for the same object, this may not always be the case (it
>certainly wasn't always the case :-).  In the future, I could see
>open() become a factory function again that could return an instance
>of a different class depending on the mode argument, the default
>encoding for files, or who knows what; but file will always remain a
>class.
>
>--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
>_______________________________________________
>Python-Dev mailing list
>Python-Dev at python.org
>http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
>Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/orbitz%40drorbitz.ath.cx
>
>  
>

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/045924.html below:

[Python-Dev] file() or open()?