[A.M. Kuchling] > It's a general comment; the document has my name on it, so I'd like it > to be my prose. So it does. My suggestion is continue to have implementers write the first draft and that you use that as a basis for altering to your own style. This matches what is done with the tutorial which has Guido's name on it but has many sections authored by others. The implementers are in a good position to highlight how something was designed to be used. The examples in the whatsnew document will likely shape how a feature is used, why it was introduced, and whether users will respond well to it (IOW, the implementer has a strong vested interest in the presentation). Like Martin, I would offer to take out my entries, but that would transform it from being completely current to being nearly vacant. Do what you want with it; I fully respect that it has your name on it. Raymond
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4