RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jul 2 04:25:20 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/045836.html

I'm -1 on the @-syntax for the same reason as Fernando Perez; IPython
from Scipy.

Scipy has its own conference, so seemingly has a fairly large user base.

IPython is an enhanced Python shell that uses @ for certain shell
accesses and aliasing.

Since there exists a piece of Python software (which may be used by a
not-insignificant number of people) that uses @, IMO, using @ for
decorators, when there exists two other valid syntaxes (either of which
many have declared to be just fine), seems a bit irresponsible.

 - Josiah

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/045836.html below:

[Python-Dev] -1 on @[decorator]