"Tim Peters" <tim.one at comcast.net> writes:
> [Thomas Heller]
>> Well, I would be much happier to build an installer with inno setup
>> instead of Martin's msi code, which I don't understand ;-(.
>
> So the choice is Martin's MSI code you don't understand, or your Inno
> RemObjects Object Pascal code Martin doesn't understand <wink>?
Probably I'm not smart enough to understand (or even maintain) Martin's
MSI code, but I guess Martin will be smart enough to understand a little
Pascal.
>> Are there really technical reasons the VC7.1 built Python binaries must
>> be distributed via msi technology or not?
>
> The most frequently requested thing MSI provides is the ability for admins
> to use MS Group Policy to push installs out to boxes on a network. This
> hasn't been requested often ("most frequently" is a relative measure ...).
I was asking because I'm not sure if there will be problems with Windows
file system protection with non-MSI installers.
Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4