RetroSearch Browse

Thu Jul 1 11:44:43 EDT 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/045816.html

Gareth McCaughan <gmccaughan at synaptics-uk.com> writes:

> By the by, I don't think it's true that sets.Set(42)
> would, under PEP276, be the usual implementation of 42
> in set theory. It would be a set whose elements are
> ordinary Python integers, which are not themselves sets.
> If you see what I mean. :-)

And that's what confused me most of all about Andy's assertion.

-- 
Dave Abrahams
Boost Consulting
http://www.boost-consulting.com

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-July/045816.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 276 (simple iterator for ints)