Trevor Perrin <trevp at trevp.net> writes: > At 10:15 AM 6/30/2004 +0100, Michael Hudson wrote: >>Unfortunately, distributing crypto software is still a hideous >>international mess (just because the *US* is less silly these >>days...). > > Things have been liberalizing rapidly. I'm not sure how true that is > anymore, though I don't have direct experience (aside from offering > some crypto software on a website; people download it from all over > the place, but maybe they're scofflaws, who knows). > > I know US export is no problem. According to [1], most countries have > no laws restricting imports, with the notable exception of ex-USSR > countries and China, which require licenses. I've heard anecdotally > the Russian requirements are mostly ignored [2]. I don't know about > China. Interesting, thanks. The concept of Python being 'imported' or 'exported' still strikes me as meaningless, but I'm not going to worry about it. Cheers, mwh -- Many of the posts you see on Usenet are actually from moths. You can tell which posters they are by their attraction to the flames. -- Internet Oracularity #1279-06
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4