On Fri, Jan 30, 2004, Tim Peters wrote: > > Tim attributes something to Barry: > >> [Barry] >>> Yes, it was. I don't remember why it was changed; we were probably >>> accused of exclusivity. That's how these things often happen. > > Someone also claiming to be "Barry" retorts: > > [Barry] >> That wern't me. I think it was Fred. > > If you scan the headers of "Fred"'s message, you'll find 13 in there. > That's Barry's secret number, so Barry must have sent it. Fred's secret > number is 68, and the headers of this later msg claiming to be from Barry > contain: > > Message-Id: <1075514668.1075.375.camel at anthem> > ^^ > > QED. Nevertheless, I agree that the message I attributed to Barry > *claimed* to have been sent by Fred. I'm afraid you'll have to work > harder than that to make a fool of me, guys. No, they won't. This is python-dev, not psf-members; we don't care who's posting here (as long experience with bots proves), only whether they make sense. You're not making sense, so your bot needs a tuneup. -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "The joy of coding Python should be in seeing short, concise, readable classes that express a lot of action in a small amount of clear code -- not in reams of trivial code that bores the reader to death." --GvR
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4