> I took a pass through the archives of January, just to get an actual > number on what people think of the ideas in the PEP. Dear Josiah, This has lasted long enough. Python is not a democracy. So here's a BDFL Pronouncement. PEP 326 is REJECTED, because: - The usefulness of the feature is marginal; - it is easily implemented when you really need it; and - we can't agree on a good way to spell it. Please don't bring this up in python-dev. It's not worth whining about. Please focus your energy on something else. I've seen good code and good ideas from of you, I would be sorry if you wasted more energy on a lost cause. Not to mention the wasted time of everyone else arguing a lost cause. --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4