> If we assume that no one is calling min or max without arguments in > order to raise a TypeError (which seems like a reasonable assumption), > then replacing the TypeError exception for behavior 1 with the following > seems reasonable: > min() -> Min > max() -> Max I consider that behavior Unreasonable. What's reasonable is min() -> Max max() -> Min
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4