Martin v. Löwis wrote: > M.-A. Lemburg wrote: > >>> No. Instead, it applies uniformly to all codecs - so in some cases, >>> users may see changes in the behaviour. >> >> Could you give an example ? >> >> The only change that I can think of is that setting up aliases >> to override builtin codecs would start working and that's more >> like a bug fix than a new feature. > > Currently, if somebody defines a codec windows_1252.py, > foo.encode("windows_1252") uses this codec. With the proposed > change, it uses cp1252.py. To see the behaviour change, no > changes to the aliases list is necessary. Thanks for the example. I agree that we should not backport the change then. -- Marc-Andre Lemburg eGenix.com Professional Python Services directly from the Source (#1, Jan 20 2004) >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ... http://www.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ... http://zope.egenix.com/ >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ... http://python.egenix.com/ ________________________________________________________________________ ::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4