RetroSearch Browse

Sun Jan 18 10:15:09 EST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/042065.html

On Sun, Jan 18, 2004, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
>
> The CJK codecs are essentially invisible to most users.  However, its
> availability will increase python's acceptance in places where it is not
> currently being used.  Increasing the user base should not have to wait
> for Py2.4.

That's not the question.  IIUC, there are already some kind of CJK codecs
available; this is a different set of codecs.  Unless these new codecs
produce the same results, we can't afford to switch.
-- 
Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com)           <*>         http://www.pythoncraft.com/

A: No.
Q: Is top-posting okay?

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/042065.html below:

[Python-Dev] python/dist/src/Lib/email/testtest_email_codecs.py, 1.4, 1.5