On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 11:01:42AM -0600, Jeff Epler wrote:
> Here are the parrotbench results, using the "user" field from "make
[snip]
I tried to reproduce these results on a Fedora Core 1 machine (x86,
1GHz) but found that the unpatched version performed better by about
.4%. I realized that the binary I used had threading disabled. I
recompiled and measured the patched version as 1% slower.
Jeff
CVS List Optimization
FC1 28.73 28.9
No threading 28.78 28.84
"user" time 28.65 28.78
on parrotbench 28.77 28.83
28.81 28.87
28.84 28.9
28.65 28.83
28.75 28.87
28.67 28.82
28.79 28.95
Minimum 28.65 28.78
Maximum 28.84 28.95
Median 28.76 28.86
Mean 28.74 28.86
St.Dev 0.07 0.05
T-test 0.05%
Difference 0.11 0.40%
of means
FC1 29.08 29.32
Threading 29.03 29.24
"user" time 29.52 29.37
on parrotbench 29.2 29.31
29.5 29.82
29.12 29.81
29.12 29.69
29.1 29.3
28.99 29.67
29.11 29.12
Minimum 28.99 29.12
Maximum 29.52 29.82
Median 29.12 29.35
Mean 29.18 29.47
St.Dev 0.18 0.26
T-test 1.05%
Difference 0.29 0.99%
of means
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4