[John Williams] > Tim's optimization seems to help even more on Linux than Windows. On > my box each iteration of the test program takes 0.80s without the > patch and 0.27 with it. Wow! That's better than I had hoped for. I'll note one subtlety: the call to realloc() probably endures mutex locking overhead to keep it threadsafe, even if the realloc() is (in the end) a nop. It certainly does under Microsoft's realloc(), but the native locking gimmicks on Windows are very fast (Windows loves threads).
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4