From: Raymond Hettinger > I am frankly surprised that so many here think that a collections module > would be bad for the language. Go figure. It's not like these are new, > untried ideas -- the goal was supposed be improving productivity by > providing higher level tools. A fast underlying implementation was just > icing on the cake. I think the "fast implementation" issue has triggered people's comments, rather than the "higher level tools" one. For the record, I'm +1 on the idea (as far as "higher level tools" goes). I'm not too bothered, in practice, how efficient the implementation is, as long as it's not visibly slower than using lists/dicts directly :-) Paul.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4