RetroSearch Browse

Fri Jan 9 17:59:30 EST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041878.html

Martin v. Loewis wrote:
> Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> 
>> What do you guys think?
> 
> -1. There is no evidence that these types are missing.
> The fact that they are absent does not apply that anybody
> would want to use them if they were available.
> 
> It might be better to develop such a module as a separate
> package, wait for user feedback, and perhaps incorporate
> this into Python in a few years.

While I second your -1, the kjbuckets package has been around
for ages and seems to provide at least a subset (or superset
depending on how you see it) of what Raymond wants to do.

I think these things are better kept and maintained outside the
Python core.

-- 
Marc-Andre Lemburg
eGenix.com

Professional Python Services directly from the Source  (#1, Jan 06 2004)
 >>> Python/Zope Consulting and Support ...        http://www.egenix.com/
 >>> mxODBC.Zope.Database.Adapter ...             http://zope.egenix.com/
 >>> mxODBC, mxDateTime, mxTextTools ...        http://python.egenix.com/
________________________________________________________________________

::: Try mxODBC.Zope.DA for Windows,Linux,Solaris,FreeBSD for free ! ::::

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041878.html below:

[Python-Dev] collections module