[Dave] >> Another possibility: we'd get a lot more mileage out of simply >> adding ctypes to the standard install. That would solve the >> immediate popen problem, let us get rid of _winreg entirely (and >> replace it with a pure Python version), and make future Win32 >> problems easier to solve. [Guido] > I don't know that a Python version of _winreg using ctypes would be > preferable over a C version. Since there is a C version, there's no need to code it in Python again. > I'd expect it to be slower, less readable than the C version, and more > susceptible to the possibility of causing segfaults. Slower: yes, but I don't know how much. Less readable: no, more readable. Susceptible to segfaults: If written correctly, it should be bullet proof - exactly the same as a C version. > That doesn't mean I don't think ctypes is a good idea -- just that I > don't think applying it to _winreg would be useful. Cool. Should this be a Windows only version, or cross-platform? Thomas
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4