"Nick Monyatovsky" <mon at ABAQUS.com> writes: > Would not it be better if you let the users (people who compile Python) decide > what they want? I believe the idea is to cater for people wanting to produce binary distributions of Python. For such people, the fewer variations they need, the better. I would be very happy to get a binary distribution of Python for HPUX, as I regularly work on HPUX machines which don't have compilers. <rant> I've a particular bee in my bonnet about HP machines, though, as I tend to work via telnet/SSH only, no X, on boxes with almost no optional extras installed. I'm sick of finding distributions of Vim which require X libraries installed, even though I'm not going to use the X features. And need to be root to install, although I only want the *(&^&*@#$ thing for my own use! </rant> Sorry about that... Paul. -- This signature intentionally left blank
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4