RetroSearch Browse

Tue Jan 6 13:16:47 EST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041733.html

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> > > +1  It would occasionally be useful to have ready access to an object
> > > whose sole purpose is to compare higher or lower than everything else.

I would certainly use such objects.  I don't think "None" and "All" are 
sufficiently explicit names for the objects, though -- the only context 
in which None makes sense to me as a name for a minimal object is in 
terms of set inclusion, but Set() != None and there is no universal set.

-- 
David Eppstein                      http://www.ics.uci.edu/~eppstein/
Univ. of California, Irvine, School of Information & Computer Science

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041733.html below:

[Python-Dev] Re: PEP 326 now online