> From neal at metaslash.com Sat Jan 03 12:28:17 2004 > . > . > . > I think newer versions of HPUX are a little better. Since most of the > HPUX resources available (snake-farm and HP Test Drive machines) tend > to be 11.x+. But very few have access to HPUX, Irix, or AIX. > > Who *are* the folks with an HP-UX interest? > I wouldn't say I have an interest in HPUX beyond the fact that > I'd like to see it work and have access to some boxes. :-) > I can try to make some time available to help. > > 2. Does anyone happen to have an executable > > built that can "import Tkinter"? That's my > > most immediate need. If you can share that > > with me, it'd help my own situation, and I'll > > continue to push for corrections in the > > standard distribution, anyway. > If so it would probably be for HPUX 11.something. > Neal Your characterization is likely apt: several of us simply want to see it work and have access to boxes. It's hard to have much more enthusiasm for it than H-P (the company to cashier OSF1, MPEix, ...) does--and that's precious little. I'll try to confine myself to technical points though, especially in anything broadcast to all of python-dev. Does someone have a Tkinter-importable Python for 11.x? I'd like to know that ... Whether to support just 11.x, or aim also for 10.20 and above, is a thorny question; it's probably easier just to do the work than to settle that one by pure reasoning. It suits me to start with 10.20, so that's what I'll do, until someone makes a specific argument to the contrary. I can probably get Irix and AIX later in the year--maybe by February. First things first ... Has anyone been in contact with the HP-UX Porting Center folks recently? I wonder if I should enlist their help ...
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4