At 14:52 01.01.2004 -0500, Tim Peters wrote: >IOW, CPython is enduring some pain to try to make this consistent too; it's >not only Jython that can't get a free ride here. is not about having a free ride, it's just that printing the id(.) in Jython as a 'at 0x<hex-something>' is misleading because id(.) now is different from System.identityHashCode which is what goes into the java cls@<identity-hash-code> repr.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4