A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041563.html below:

Are we collecting benchmark results across machines

[Python-Dev] Re: Are we collecting benchmark results across machines [Python-Dev] Re: Are we collecting benchmark results across machinesBrad Clements bkc at murkworks.com
Thu Jan 1 12:59:08 EST 2004
Python 2.3.2 (#49)  pystone test on my Win2k SP4 machine.

Note this is a  1.6 ghz Pentium M (Centrino)

Pystone(1.1) time for 50000 passes = 1.3762
This machine benchmarks at 36331.9 pystones/second

Faster than Anthony's 3Ghz P4.

I believe this processor has a very large on-board cache.. I'm not sure how large. It's a 
Dell Lattitude D800.

My point being, I think pystone performance is greatly effected by CPU cache, more so 
than CPU clock speed.


-- 
Brad Clements,                bkc at murkworks.com   (315)268-1000
http://www.murkworks.com                          (315)268-9812 Fax
http://www.wecanstopspam.org/                   AOL-IM: BKClements


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4