> > The ordering is supposed to be an unimportant detail. The external > > program solution won't work due to the nature of the benchmark. I'll > > fix the benchmark some time next week. The fix should be fairly > > simple and localized. > > It was easier than I thought, so it's in place. Version 1.0.2 uses a > subclass of dict whose __repr__ sorts the keys. The running time > doesn't seem to be substantially affected. > > (Oh how I love subclassing builtin classes!) Make that 1.0.3. There were two relevant dict usages -- one for globals and one for locals. :-) --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4