On Friday 27 February 2004 03:20 am, Raymond Hettinger wrote: > I've been working on ways to speedup parameter passing for function > calls. It's somewhat expensive to pull parameters off of the stack, > assemble them into a new tuple, have the function disassemble the tuple, > and ultimately free the tuple. ... > My idea is for a new flag, METH_STACK, that generalizes (and potentially > replaces) METH_NOARGS AND METH_O. How would METH_STACK methods work when called via func(*args) or via the various functions of the C API? The nice thing about METH_NOARGS and METH_O is that they describe what the called function needs. METH_STACK sounds like a core dump waiting to happen. ;-( -Fred -- Fred L. Drake, Jr. <fdrake at acm.org> PythonLabs at Zope Corporation
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4