> I was asked why python required a ":" in its syntax and then saw > Pete Shinners query on changing the parser to treat "def" to ":" as a unit. > > What is the purpose of the ":"? > > Why doesn't the parser work as Pete suggests already? > Of course the same rules should be true of "if" and ":", "while" and ":" If I recall correctly, the original reason for the ":" is that the designers of ABC (which provided much of the original inspiration for Python) conducted a study and found that people recognized block boundaries better if they were introduced by a ":" in addition to being indentation delimited then if they were just indentation delimited. For more details see this posting of Tim's: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-list/2000-December/022506.html > if x > 10 > and x < 20: > do_in_range() > > rather then > > if( x > 10 > and x < 20 ): > do_in_range() Interesting. Everyone has their own preferences, but I find BOTH of these very difficult to read. I would prefer if (x > 10 and x < 20): do_in_range() Of course if (10 < x < 20): do_in_range() is even better <wink>. -- Michael Chermside
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4