"Delaney, Timothy C (Timothy)" <tdelaney at avaya.com> writes: > Anyway, those are my thoughts on the whole topic. I'm: Nice work. > +1 on syntax for decorators attached to function definitions > +1 on def foo (bar) [baz]: > +0 on def foo (bar) as baz: if there's a way to extend it multi-line. > -1 on all the other proposed syntaxes. > -1 on restricting it to specific decorators such as classmethod I agree, FWIW. Cheers, mwh -- Gullible editorial staff continues to post links to any and all articles that vaguely criticize Linux in any way. -- Reason #4 for quitting slashdot today, from http://www.cs.washington.edu/homes/klee/misc/slashdot.html
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4