Bob Ippolito wrote:
> def myfunc(x, y) [accepts(int, int), returns(int)]:
> pass
>
> Nothing stops you from (ab)using this syntax to do it.. but you may
> need to specify kwarg names twice if you want to skip some, and you
> would probably have a hard time deciding how to spell adaptation of
> *args or **kwargs :)
Why? Inventing obcure syntax is an easy part:
def myfunc(*x, **y) [accepts([int], {string:int}), returns(int)]: pass
Hard part is keep it simple and useful. ;)
Mike
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4