Thomas Heller wrote:
> The above code looks like as someone forgot to actually initialize the
> class variable (probably not too likely with the name 'classmethod', but
> with other names):
>
> class klass:
> classmethod = 42
> def foo():...
Yes I know. I just wanted to encourage people to think
of simpler alternatives but to spoil the language
for tiny improvements.
I didn't just want to say "this is ugly", but to think of
ways to express "the following is meant to be a... method".
Onw thing I could live with if I must is "class method",
since it is similar to other languages.
reminds-me-of-ternary-operators -- chris
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tismer at stackless.com>
Mission Impossible 5oftware : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Johannes-Niemeyer-Weg 9a : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14109 Berlin : PGP key -> http://wwwkeys.pgp.net/
work +49 30 89 09 53 34 home +49 30 802 86 56 mobile +49 173 24 18 776
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4