On Thu, 2004-02-26 at 03:31, Jeremy Fincher wrote:
> efer this syntax to any other suggested syntax. Perhaps it's
> because I'm used to C (or practically any other language with type
> declarations), which puts type declarations ("restraints") before the defined
> function rather than after.
I think I still like the pre--function-name-bracket-bracketed-decorator
syntax because of the English-like parsing combined with the visual
(parenthetical) distinction.
-Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4