Guido: > Why is it important *not* to have this property? Probably not greatly important, it just seems to me that there ought to be a fairly strong reason for taking the somewhat drastic step of making something non-subclassable. > it helps the implementation a bit Only a tiny bit, surely? Anything which accepts a boolean has to be prepared to deal with any type of object anyway. Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | A citizen of NewZealandCorp, a | Christchurch, New Zealand | wholly-owned subsidiary of USA Inc. | greg at cosc.canterbury.ac.nz +--------------------------------------+
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4