RetroSearch Browse

Fri Feb 13 21:41:52 EST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-February/042564.html

[Neal Norwitz]
> Missing the return -1; when list_resize() fails?

Yes.  Will fix.

> In the following 2 for loops, the original code modified
> self->ob_size. In the new version I don't notice ob_size
> being updated. Given the context, I'm not sure if the behaviour
> is different or not between versions.

self->ob_size is now updated by list_resize() so the loop
no longer needs to do the update.  This is a nice improvement
clients of list_resize() do not need to manage ob_size; rather,
the just request the size they want and the data structure keeps
its integrity.

Raymond

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-February/042564.html below:

[Python-checkins] python/dist/src/Objects listobject.c, 2.177, 2.178