A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-February/042560.html below:

[Python-Dev] bool does not want to be subclassed?

[Python-Dev] bool does not want to be subclassed? [Python-Dev] bool does not want to be subclassed?Tim Peters tim.one at comcast.net
Fri Feb 13 18:48:23 EST 2004
[Joshua Marshall]
> ...
> So a different question...  Can it be relied upon that two expressions
> which both evaluate to False both return the same object?

Yes.

> That is, is it incorrect for a Python interpreter not to do this?

Yes.

> I find this in the Python Reference Manual: "for immutable types,
> operations that compute new values may actually return a reference to
> any existing object with the same type and value" (note the "may").
> Are bool and NoneType the only types for which this is reliably the case?

Type objects are also singletons (e.g., type(True) returns the same object
as type(False); ditto type("True") and type("False") and type("xyz"); etc).


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4