Guido van Rossum wrote: > They are (unfortunately) still incomplete, >>and it is doubtful whether I can complete them before PyCon. > > > Maybe it can be a sprint topic? Sure! I can release what I have at the time. The risky part is that these are *many* changes, with the danger of introducing subtle bugs, so a review of the changes would be definitely helpful. >>This is the tricky part that I want to defer in the first round >>of patches: I believe ob_size should be a signed type, so it should >>be ssize_t where available. The tricky part is finding an appropriate >>type on systems where ssize_t is not available. > > > Why not simply use Py_intptr_t then? Conceptually, it is a different thing, because sizeof(void*) and sizeof(size_t) may differ on some platform. For practical purposes, they propably won't differ on any platform supported by Python. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4