On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 19:44, Bill Janssen wrote: > > So you are classifying this as a bug then. That was part of my question > > since it only happens if you don't handle your threads properly (or at > > least I think properly; I would assume it is common practice to close > > down your threads). > > Really? I would assume it's common practice to let the garbage > collector shut down your threads. After all, people don't handle > errors either. Most code doesn't even check for them. I don't trust the garbage collector to have any sane shutdown semantics, especially regarding threads. In my own code, I always make the best effort to shut threads (daemon or otherwise) down explicitly. -Barry
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4