A RetroSearch Logo

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Search Query:

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-February/042515.html below:

[Python-Dev] Optimization of the Year

[Python-Dev] Optimization of the Year [Python-Dev] Optimization of the YearArmin Rigo arigo at tunes.org
Wed Feb 11 06:30:00 EST 2004
Hello Martin,

On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:02:04AM +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
> I think Python 2.4 might be binary-incompatible with 2.3, anyway.

My (limited) experience with it is that although 2.n is generally incompatible
with 2.n-1, for some relatively large proportion of extensions it doesn't
matter because they just don't use the parts of the API that changed.

If you make the list API binary-incompatible then obviously the proportion
will shrink dramatically.


A bientot,

Armin.


More information about the Python-Dev mailing list

RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue

Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo

HTML: 3.2 | Encoding: UTF-8 | Version: 0.7.4