Hello Martin, On Wed, Feb 11, 2004 at 08:02:04AM +0100, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > I think Python 2.4 might be binary-incompatible with 2.3, anyway. My (limited) experience with it is that although 2.n is generally incompatible with 2.n-1, for some relatively large proportion of extensions it doesn't matter because they just don't use the parts of the API that changed. If you make the list API binary-incompatible then obviously the proportion will shrink dramatically. A bientot, Armin.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4