On Tue, 2004-02-10 at 13:54, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote: > Brett wrote: > > So you are classifying this as a bug then. That was part of my question > > since it only happens if you don't handle your threads properly (or at > > least I think properly; I would assume it is common practice to close > > down your threads). > > Certainly: in a properly working program, one would terminate all > threads first before trying to exit the program. Failure to do so > should cause an exception (or otherwise have an "obvious" meaning). > However, that exception should not be a "double-fault"; instead, > it should give a clear indication what the problem is. What about daemon threads? They are running by intention when the program exits, otherwise they wouldn't be daemon threads. Jeremy
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4