Martin v. Löwis wrote: > Brett wrote: > >> My question is whether this is worth fixing. Since it only occurs if >> you don't shut down your threads it seems like it is not really a bug >> but just unexpected behavior from not cleaning up after yourself. >> But, as I said in my bug report post, I think it is fixable. So is it >> even worth fixing in some non-pretty way? > > > IMO, any bug is worth fixing. This being free software, contributors are > free to chose what they work on. > So you are classifying this as a bug then. That was part of my question since it only happens if you don't handle your threads properly (or at least I think properly; I would assume it is common practice to close down your threads). > It would be much more useful if you would provide thread cancellation > in the process :-) > For some crazy reason having to delve into the world of thread libraries for those cases where there is not an equivalent pthread_cancel does not sound fun. =) -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4