Skip Montanaro wrote: > So, I take it Python currently insists on conformance with C89, correct? Correct: It is ok if it breaks if the system does not have all C89 features. Lack of some C99 features is ok. (Notice that this is slightly different from "insists on conformance with C89": A C99 implementation is not strictly conforming with C89, e.g. because the value of the __STDC__ macro is different. However, a C99 implementation will support all C89 features). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4