Terry Reedy wrote: > "Brett C." <bac at ocf.berkeley.edu> wrote in message > news:41CC7F67.9070009 at ocf.berkeley.edu... > > At to the title, bytecodes are a property of the CPython implementation, > not of Python itself. Since I think the distinction is quite important to > maintain, I would insert the missing 'C' and everywhere else as > appropriate. > Then the same could be said for PEP 306. But I don't mind changing the title. > >>After implementing over 10 new opcodes for my thesis I figured I should >>write down the basic steps in an info PEP so that there is enough >>guidelines with this PEP and PEP 306 to cover the bases on changes to the >>language itself. > > > Over the last several years, various people have reported experimenting > with CPython's bytecodes. I wonder if it would be helpful to have a > respository of the results, in one place, for new experimenters and curious > people to peruse. > Wouldn't hurt. Adding that section would not be bad, but I don't have the inclination to hunt them down. What do others think about having this section? -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4