A.M. Kuchling wrote: > On Sun, Dec 12, 2004 at 03:32:03PM -0200, Carlos Ribeiro wrote: > >>Of course, the point here is not Perl-bashing. The point here is that >>we should be able to "sell" Python better than we do now, even without >>the need to resort to such poor measures. I'm sure the Python >>community does have good & creative people that can write a good >>"selling" FAQ for Python, emphasizing the main points of the language. > > > No one disagrees that Python needs better marketing material. At the > last PyCon a group of people sat down in a pydotorg BoF and agreed > that yes, we do need a management-friendly marketing site, and that we > could put it on a separate hostname (something.python.org) so that the > current www.python.org wouldn't have to be changed. > > However, no one has actually sat down and written such a site, or even > outlined it. Let me encourage you to go ahead and do that. You could > draft the outline on a Wiki page, and then later figure out an > attractive design and organization for a new site. Whatever it looks like, it should probably run on Zope plus Plone. 8-) You know... eat your own dog food. 8-) The kind folks over at Zettai! have provided some space for me. Perhaps they will be glad to host the main Python site, as well? -- \/ \/ (O O) -- --------------------oOOo~(_)~oOOo---------------------------------------- Keith Dart <kdart at kdart.com> vcard: <http://www.kdart.com/~kdart/kdart.vcf> public key: ID: F3D288E4 URL: <http://www.kdart.com/~kdart/public.key> ============================================================================
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4