At 08:22 AM 12/11/04 -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote: >BTW I strongly disagree that making easy .EXE binaries available will >address this issue; while not bundled, there are plenty of solutions >for maning .EXEs for those who need them, and this is not something >that typically worries managers. But the perception of Python as >"slow" does worry managers. The relevant memes are that "compiled == fast", and that ".exe == compiled". It's not about .exe as a distribution format, but rather that producing an .exe is supporting evidence of having a "real" compiler. IOW, if there exists a compiler, but it doesn't produce .exe's, it won't be considered a "real" compiler by many programmers.
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4