Bjorn Tillenius wrote: > There are some issues regarding the use of unicode in doctests. Consider > the following three tests. > > >>> foo = u'föö' > >>> foo > u'f\xf6\xf6' > > >>> foo > u'f\u00f6\u00f6' > > >>> foo > u'föö' > > To me, those are identical. really? if a function is expected to print "öl", is it alright to print "\u00f6l" instead? wouldn't you complain if your newspaper used Unicode escapes in headlines instead of Swedish characters? > Is it supposed to be like this, or have I missed something? If I could > specify the encoding for DocFileSuite to use, I would at least be > partially happy. repr() always generates the same output, no matter what encoding you use. just use repr, and you're done. </F>
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4