On Mon, Aug 30, 2004, Peter Harris wrote: > > I have updated PEP309 a little, mostly to add the SF patch numbers for > the implementation (still waiting for someone to check it in), and to > note that the '@' character has been claimed for decorators, although > nobody really wanted it for PEP309 anyway. > > I hope there will still be time to squeeze it in before 2.4 beta 1, and > if there is any reason why not (apart from there has to be a cut-off > point somewhere, which I accept), please someone let me know what work > is still needed to make it ready to go in. What's PEP309? (People reading python-dev do not all have all PEP numbers memorized, and it's not reasonable to expect everyone to go look them up when it would take you only a few moments to save everyone else time.) -- Aahz (aahz at pythoncraft.com) <*> http://www.pythoncraft.com/ "To me vi is Zen. To use vi is to practice zen. Every command is a koan. Profound to the user, unintelligible to the uninitiated. You discover truth everytime you use it." --reddy at lion.austin.ibm.com
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4