damien morton wrote: > Maybe this is the time to thow out the idea that strings arent > sequences. Not backwards comaptable, but strings might grow a > string.chars property that _is_ a sequence, but strings themselves arent > sequences. I very much doubt users will accept such a change - especially if the rationale is that it is made to prevent a certain class of errors; the change itself is likely to *introduce* new errors, both for changing the existing code, and for the feature itself. We would need to come up with a type for string.chars, and people would pass *that* around, recreating the original problem. I would hope that pychecker could diagnose this kind of problem in many cases. Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4