Michael Hudson wrote: > Well, it certainly seems I goofed with that checkin: as the message > implies, I thought the code I was touching only affected Irix. I seem > to have mentally entirely paged out the details, though. > > Sorry for all the pain. No need to worry. This happens, and CVS is there for tracing things back, and undoing/redoing them. Of course, anybody involved could have done the analysis that Trent did (and yes, that includes yours truly). Regards, Martin
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4