RetroSearch Browse

Wed Aug 25 14:33:06 CEST 2004 · https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/048367.html

On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 00:11, Raymond Hettinger wrote:
> I don’t think Barry got notes showing that I reviewed his patch.

I didn't, but I'm not sure it's SF's fault.  It's possible that such a
message got caught by my Spambayes filters, however I recently built out
a new mail server and my filters were pointing at imap folders on the
old server.  So any Unsures or Spam I got in the last week or so were
bit bucketed.  I definitely didn't see them in my regular inbox.

I also get patches in a digest and tend to ignore them when swamped.

But I will review your comments on the PEP 292 patch later today.

-Barry

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 307 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040825/ed2b5a96/attachment.pgp

Home - News ( United States | United Kingdom | Italy | Germany ) - Football scores

Showing content from https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/048367.html below:

[Python-Dev] Is something wrong with SF patch notifications?