Robert Brewer wrote: > Brett C. wrote: > >>Option two out of all of this is people just say, "summarize what you >>want, Brett." Then I just cover what I find interesting and just > > don't > >>worry about covering a specific area. > > > +1. Bring back "Skipped Threads" if you can, just for the sake of > indexing completeness. > Do people miss the "Skipped Threads" feature of the summaries? Part of the point of cutting down is so I can just delete the threads that won't be covered and cut down on my inbox. But if people do like the feature then I could stand to leave the emails in my box and have a list of threads I just didn't touch (sans linking, that is just not worth the hassle until I write a tool to generate the links automatically). -Brett
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4