On Fri, 2004-08-20 at 10:40, Aahz wrote: > I'm +1 on a package. I'm a strong +0 on naming the package ``string``. > > However, the reason I didn't speak up earlier was because I thought > Raymond had a good technical point about his failure in getting your > package to work, and I can't in good conscience support the package > until that's resolved. Did you try it? I'm really interested in getting additional feedback, because AFAIK only Raymond and I have. It works for me, but doesn't for him. But if the package problem turns out to be real, we shouldn't support it, or expend too much effort fixing it. -Barry -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 307 bytes Desc: This is a digitally signed message part Url : http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/attachments/20040820/73ea27df/attachment.pgp
RetroSearch is an open source project built by @garambo | Open a GitHub Issue
Search and Browse the WWW like it's 1997 | Search results from DuckDuckGo
HTML:
3.2
| Encoding:
UTF-8
| Version:
0.7.4